Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: m h <sesquile@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code
Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 20:55:31
Message-Id: e36b84ee0605011354k7e925449la6eceab0d3fc75c5@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code by Donnie Berkholz
1 Based on the recent "Stabilizing portage 2.1" thread, should I provide
2 patches based on pre9 or pre10?
3
4 thanks
5
6 matt
7
8 On 4/30/06, Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> wrote:
9 > m h wrote:
10 > > OK will do that. Since, I'm not a patching pro, can you suggest a
11 > > good way of creating a series of patches that apply on top of each
12 > > other? (I'd like to do it the "right" way)
13 >
14 > I suggest
15 > dev-util/quilt -- if you like GUIs, try dev-util/gquilt.
16 >
17 > Thanks,
18 > Donnie
19 > --
20 > gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list
21 >
22 >
23
24 --
25 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code m h <sesquile@×××××.com>