| 1 |
On Sunday 12 June 2005 02:09, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 12 June 2005 00:34, Brian wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Am I correct in that the imported instance of portage was still using |
| 4 |
> > the old metadata cache at the time of import? Even though the cache was |
| 5 |
> > updated at the end of the sync. After a sync we should re-initialize |
| 6 |
> > our instance of portage for it to use the new cache? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Correct. I'm not sure what will happen in the future, but adding checks for |
| 9 |
> this into the current design will noticably slow down the general case |
| 10 |
> (where the cache isn't changed by external processes). |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Incorrect. I checked the code rather than making assumptions and found that it |
| 13 |
is going to disk everytime already - at least in the case of the default flat |
| 14 |
files. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Regards, |
| 17 |
Jason Stubbs |
Archives