1 |
On 24/03/06, Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Checking the interfaces/symbols sucks however, because you can only do |
3 |
> it _after_ you've built whatever you're building (packages do adjust |
4 |
> the defines/typedefs/structs dependant on configure/build options). |
5 |
> |
6 |
> As I stated earlier, bincompat (not binslot paul :P) is the route to |
7 |
> go- it gives you up front information so a resolver can plan out what |
8 |
> has to be rebuilt automatically. |
9 |
|
10 |
no-no-no i'm not talking about binary and i will make another thread |
11 |
when i go further with my own topic :) to use those interfaces, u dont |
12 |
need to compile anything. |
13 |
|
14 |
> ~harring |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
tvali |
18 |
|
19 |
Measuring programming progress by lines of code is like measuring |
20 |
aircraft building progress by weight. -Bill Gates |
21 |
|
22 |
For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, |
23 |
and wrong. -H L Mencken |
24 |
|
25 |
Theory is when you know something, but it doesn't work. Practice is |
26 |
when something works, but you don't know why. Programmers combine |
27 |
theory and practice: Nothing works and they don't know why. |
28 |
|
29 |
http://www.eskimo.com/~hottub/software/programming_quotes.html |
30 |
http://www.softwarequotes.com/ |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |