1 |
Hi everybody. |
2 |
|
3 |
On Friday 05 December 2003 08:54, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
4 |
> Everyone, please note above that I said "have a design competition *once |
5 |
> we have the requirements finalized*." This hasn't happened yet. Please |
6 |
Yes, and I apologise about that. |
7 |
However as there seem to be a bit of confusion I want to emphasize again that |
8 |
this is really not a design contest entry - I would be too ashaimed to |
9 |
propose these few ideas I listed in the design *of the illustratory |
10 |
prototype* as a portage-ng design :). |
11 |
|
12 |
The purpose of this entry was to illustrate the capabilities of Ada language. |
13 |
The intention is to bring up some information with the code that illustrates |
14 |
what can be expected when you use it for people to look at and form the |
15 |
opinion. I am not trying to push towards Ada-only, as it was taken on one or |
16 |
two occasions :). However knowing the state of affairs with the languages and |
17 |
having programmed in a few of these I felt it would be helpfull to have an |
18 |
illustration up on the better practices I encountered. |
19 |
|
20 |
Probably because of too much time spent on writing my paper (the unrelated |
21 |
biophys one) I chose a bit too catchy title, for which I apologise again. |
22 |
|
23 |
Since a few good points were brought up, that might be relevant to |
24 |
requirements as well, I feel obliged to answer some of the posters (in |
25 |
particular pvdabeel's) and dissolve some misconceptions (spider's are a good |
26 |
example :)). |
27 |
However starting a language flame war is definitely not anything I would like |
28 |
to do. As such, I would prefer to keep the design discussions to |
29 |
gentoo-portage-dev list. I will also answer any ada-related questions you may |
30 |
have off list, except may be for one or two postings on -dev, to which I'll |
31 |
reply to the list. |
32 |
|
33 |
George |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |