Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] ACCEPT_KEYWORDS depreciation
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:56:05
Message-Id: 200512151455.37130.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] ACCEPT_KEYWORDS depreciation by Alec Joseph Warner
1 On Thursday 15 December 2005 14:13, Alec Joseph Warner wrote:
2 > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
3 > > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:35:07 -0500 Alec Warner <warnera6@×××××××.edu>
4 > >
5 > > wrote:
6 > > | I've been trying to sit in #gentoo more often ( I figured insanity
7 > > | would be a good excuse for my crummy grades ) and I am scared by the
8 > > | fact that people still walk in and try using ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~blar"
9 > > | to emerge things. We all know why this is bad, and it's been bad for
10 > > | quite some time.
11 > > |
12 > > | Opinions on adding a warning when users have set this in their
13 > > | environment?
14 > >
15 > > If you're warning on that, you could also warn on far more dangerous
16 > > and at least equally as common things like silly CFLAGS or having
17 > > LDFLAGS set.
18 >
19 > Well I wouldn't consider those incorrect portage usage.
20
21 and neither is ACCEPT_KEYWORDS imo
22
23 > The deal with
24 > this is we used to recommend ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~arch" emerge foo. People
25 > still use this convention; so I hope that a warning will inform people to
26 > not use it.
27
28 deprecating that we recommend the usage sure, but deprecating the syntax not
29 so good ... there's a bunch of ways i use portage that slowly seem to be
30 'deprecated', and it's getting annoying :P
31 -mike
32 --
33 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list