Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [RFC] gpkg format proposal v2 | ||
| Date: | Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:24:09 | ||
| Message-Id: | w6g7ehi11uy.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [RFC] gpkg format proposal v2 by "Michał Górny" |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >> Also, what would be wrong with ar? It's a standard POSIX tool, and |
| 4 | >> should be available everywhere. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > The original post says what's wrong with ar. Please be more specific |
| 7 | > if you disagree with it. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | AFAICS, the arguments are that ar would be obscure, and that the LSB |
| 10 | considers it deprecated. I don't find either of them convincing. |
| 11 | Since when do we care about the LSB? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Ulrich |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [RFC] gpkg format proposal v2 | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [RFC] gpkg format proposal v2 | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |