| 1 |
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 02:20:02AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> Trying to alter patches that have been split up is a PITA. Missed a var rename |
| 3 |
> in the patch just sent. :/ |
| 4 |
Heh, nice timing on the max_fd_limit, beat me in sending it by 46 |
| 5 |
seconds :) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Personally... for a change like what you're introducing into |
| 8 |
portage_exec, I prefer a single patch. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Chunked patched make sense depending on a somewhat subjective |
| 11 |
grouping; in this case, familiar with the underlying code so |
| 12 |
interpretting it all is possible, but if it were any other source I |
| 13 |
would've resorted to applying the series, then diffing between svn and |
| 14 |
the changes. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Your call really, since you're generating the patch(es). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
~harring |
Archives