Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From:	Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To:	"Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc:	gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0
Date:	Sat, 14 Dec 2019 09:32:37
Message-Id:	`w6g36dnuuad.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0 by "Michał Górny"

1	>>>>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2019, Michał Górny wrote:
2
3	> Actually, I added that because of your comment that people should be
4	> rebasing patches rather than removing context.
5
6	Isn't rebasing easier than removing context, anyway? I'd trust the
7	maintainer to do the right thing there.
8
9	The main argument is that the warning is apparently seen by some users,
10	who will then file unwanted bug reports. (Also, as I said before, we
11	don't even have a policy that patches must apply without fuzz.)
12
13	Ulrich

File name	MIME type
signature.asc	application/pgp-signature