1 |
On Saturday 18 January 2014 21:00:48 Chris Reffett wrote: |
2 |
> --- /dev/null |
3 |
> +++ b/pym/portage/util/rochecker.py |
4 |
> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ |
5 |
> +#-*- coding:utf-8 -*- |
6 |
> +# Copyright 2014 Gentoo Foundation |
7 |
> +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 |
8 |
> +""" |
9 |
> +Methods to check whether Portage is going to write to read-only |
10 |
> filesystems. +Since the methods are not portable across different OSes, |
11 |
> each OS needs its +own method. To expand RO checking for different OSes, |
12 |
> add a method which +accepts a list of directories and returns a list of |
13 |
> mounts which need to be +remounted RW, then add "elif ostype == (the |
14 |
> ostype value for your OS)" to |
15 |
|
16 |
prefer OSes -> OS's |
17 |
|
18 |
> +get_ro_checker() |
19 |
> +""" |
20 |
|
21 |
period at the end |
22 |
|
23 |
> +def get_ro_checker(): |
24 |
> + """ |
25 |
> + Uses the system type to find an appropriate method for testing whether |
26 |
> Portage |
27 |
> + is going to write to any read-only filesystems |
28 |
> + |
29 |
> + @return: |
30 |
> + 1. A method for testing for RO filesystems appropriate to the current |
31 |
> system |
32 |
> + """ |
33 |
|
34 |
not a new issue, but we really need to get away from this style and use |
35 |
PEP257. someone feel like fixing that in the code base ? :) |
36 |
|
37 |
> + if ostype == "Linux": |
38 |
> + return linux_ro_checker |
39 |
> + else: |
40 |
> + return empty_ro_checker |
41 |
|
42 |
isn't this a glorified dict ? |
43 |
|
44 |
_CHECKERS = { |
45 |
'Linux': linux_ro_checker, |
46 |
} |
47 |
|
48 |
def get_ro_checker() |
49 |
return _CHECKERS.get(ostype, empty_ro_checker) |
50 |
-mike |