| 1 |
On 11/27/2015 06:10 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 14:46 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:35:39 +0000 |
| 4 |
>> Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 13:46 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:45:48 +0000 |
| 8 |
>>>> Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>>> On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 00:41 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 11 |
>>>>>> On 11/27/2015 12:24 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
| 12 |
>>>>>>> On a related note, could not profile-formats = portage-2 profile-set |
| 13 |
>>>>>>> become default ? |
| 14 |
>>>>>> |
| 15 |
>>>>>> For purposes of interoperability, we use PMS to document the standard |
| 16 |
>>>>>> profile format. So, in order to change the default profile format as you |
| 17 |
>>>>>> suggest, we would have to change PMS retroactively. Generally, |
| 18 |
>>>>>> retroactive changes to PMS need to be very well justified in order to be |
| 19 |
>>>>>> accepted. |
| 20 |
>>>>> |
| 21 |
>>>>> hmm, how about in gentoo layout.conf? |
| 22 |
>>>>> There seems to be additions there so perhaps one can add |
| 23 |
>>>>> profile-formats = portage-2 profile-set ? |
| 24 |
>>>> |
| 25 |
>>>> This will break the two alternative package managers as profile-set is |
| 26 |
>>>> only implemented in Portage. |
| 27 |
>>> |
| 28 |
>>> What about: |
| 29 |
>>> # Use thin Manifests for Git |
| 30 |
>>> thin-manifests = false |
| 31 |
>>> |
| 32 |
>>> # Sign Git commits, and NOT Manifests |
| 33 |
>>> sign-commits = false |
| 34 |
>>> sign-manifests = false |
| 35 |
>>> |
| 36 |
>>> Are these not fairly new too? How could these enter the gentoo repo? |
| 37 |
>> |
| 38 |
>> Hardly. They were both supported for a few years now (and used in many |
| 39 |
>> repositories), and considered useful. |
| 40 |
>> |
| 41 |
>>> What about adding portage-2 now and announce profile-set to be added soon? |
| 42 |
>> |
| 43 |
>> Why? Most of us don't even have a clue what is it and how it works. |
| 44 |
>> In fact, the name 'portage-*' implies it's non-standard extension that |
| 45 |
>> can't be used where portability matters. |
| 46 |
>> |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> portage-2 allows stacking of (custom) profiles, very useful I think. |
| 49 |
> profile-set I think is needed for the @profile set, impl. in https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532224 |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
> Jocke |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
You can open a separate [Future EAPI] bug for each feature that you |
| 55 |
would like added to PMS. For example: |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282296 |
| 58 |
-- |
| 59 |
Thanks, |
| 60 |
Zac |
Archives