Archives
Archives
| From: | Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] EventLoop: add run_until_complete method (bug 591760) | ||
| Date: | Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:18:07 | ||
| Message-Id: | 71729cdc-c022-e561-b6e2-956ce5dd11df@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] EventLoop: add run_until_complete method (bug 591760) by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On 21/08/16 00:18, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 | > This emulates the |
| 3 | > asyncio.AbstractEventLoop.run_until_complete(future) interface |
| 4 | What's that, and why are we emulating it instead of just using it? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > which will make it possible to reduce latency in situations where it |
| 7 | > is desirable for a loop to exit at the earliest opportunity. |
| 8 | It makes it possible -- okay. But does it? I'm reluctant to change |
| 9 | things willy nilly, and add SLOCs, without a tangible benefit. |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Alexander |
| 12 | bernalex@g.o |
| 13 | https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] EventLoop: add run_until_complete method (bug 591760) | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |