| 1 |
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:15:18 -0700, George Shapovalov wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>Well, what's going on is not that its "legally dead". It got its start and we |
| 4 |
>threw a bunch of comments on the "design". However there does not seem to be |
| 5 |
>much push behind it at the moment. I suspect there may be only one dev |
| 6 |
>working on it (pvdabeel?), if at all. However there is clearly an effort to |
| 7 |
>clean-up and enhance the [oroginal] portage under way. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
ok after all I care less about a portage-ng but about something I can use on |
| 10 |
non-Linux platforms :-) Is pvdabeel also reading this list? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
cu |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Adrian |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives