1 |
Alexander Berntsen posted on Mon, 01 Jun 2015 23:15:09 +0200 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Friends, |
4 |
> |
5 |
> It would be advantageous |
6 |
|
7 |
[TLDR summary: Agree with the point but nearly deleted as spam.] |
8 |
|
9 |
At that point I was double-checking for spam: |
10 |
|
11 |
1) Vague, spammy, subject. |
12 |
|
13 |
2) Vague, almost too formally "collegial" "Friends" greeting. |
14 |
|
15 |
3) "It would be advantageous"? In a non-spam mail? Don't see /that/ |
16 |
sort of formal "distant" wording very often... except in spam! But maybe |
17 |
my mailing circle is significantly different than yours. <shrug> |
18 |
|
19 |
On the counter-spam side, how many spammers would be (true or fake) |
20 |
gpg-signing? I've learned to ignore that for quick reads (tho could of |
21 |
course verify if I needed to and thus appreciate the value), but saw it |
22 |
once I was second-looking, and that was enough to convince me to read |
23 |
further, at which point I saw that the mail was legit. |
24 |
|
25 |
On topic, meanwhile, not that a non-dev opinion counts for too much, but |
26 |
FWIW, agreed with the point. I don't do IRC so seeing the acks, etc, on- |
27 |
list, would make it easier for me to follow too. =:^) |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
31 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
32 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |