1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:14:20 -0800 Brian <dol-sen@×××××.net> wrote: |
3 |
> | emerge -pv <package> |
4 |
> | |
5 |
> | would actually continue listing (modified normal)after finding a |
6 |
> | dependency is masked rather than stop on, and report only, the first |
7 |
> | one. The masked packages would need to be marked as such [hard |
8 |
> | masked, keyword masked], possibly shown grouped in blocks [KEYWORD, |
9 |
> | HARD MASKED, STABLE]. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Problem is, once you hit one bad dependency, you can't carry on and |
12 |
> guarantee what the rest of the dep tree is going to be. Example: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> emerge -pv foo |
15 |
> |
16 |
> foo DEPENDs upon bar and baz |
17 |
> bar DEPENDS upon fnord, and is MASKED |
18 |
> baz DEPENDs upon || ( gerbil fnord ) |
19 |
> |
20 |
Well, that and other semantic issues (what to do with multiple |
21 |
candidates for example?). |
22 |
|
23 |
Marius |
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |