Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Samuel Bernardo <samuelbernardo.mail@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Cc: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage patch now on gentoo-portage-dev ml
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 23:17:07
Message-Id: e48a3437-6697-33a7-badd-eea46289526a@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage patch now on gentoo-portage-dev ml by Samuel Bernardo
1 Hello,
2
3 Is this mailing list alive?
4
5 Should I place questions about portage and ebuild development in another
6 mailing list?
7
8 Best,
9
10 Samuel
11
12
13 On 09/12/2017 09:45 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote:
14 > Hello again,
15 >
16 > About the ebuild code check, the only script that I need to patch is
17 > ebuild command right?
18 >
19 > A prefer not to install portage-9999 and only apply a patch to the
20 > current stable version of the portage.
21 >
22 > I also realized that portage releases are available from
23 > https://dev.gentoo.org/~dolsen/releases/portage/ and that releases on
24 > https://anongit.gentoo.org/git/proj/portage.git don't have the tags in
25 > accordance to the current release (2.3.6). I search the tags in git
26 > repository for v2.3.6 and I coudn't find it (v2.3.0_rc1).
27 >
28 > So is release cycle in the repository different from the releases
29 > available in dev.gentoo.org?
30 >
31 > How are you managing the releases delivery?
32 >
33 > I'm interested to follow the portage future updates and have the ebuild
34 > development updated for the next release.
35 >
36 > Cheers :)
37 >
38 >
39 > On 09/12/2017 09:18 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote:
40 >> Hi Michał,
41 >>
42 >> On 09/12/2017 06:29 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
43 >>> W dniu wto, 12.09.2017 o godzinie 17∶33 +0100, użytkownik Samuel
44 >>> Bernardo napisał:
45 >>>> Hi,
46 >>>>
47 >>>> How can I test my overlay ebuilds using the new portage EAPI that is
48 >>>> only available on gentoo-portage-dev ml?
49 >>>>
50 >>>> I don't know where is gentoo-portage-dev... Is it a gentoo portage tree
51 >>>> available from git or some url for syncing?
52 >>>>
53 >>> I don't really understand what you're asking for. Is it about
54 >>> the failures with commands in global scope? If it's that, then it's
55 >>> already merged and available via =sys-apps/portage-9999.
56 >>>
57 >> Yes is that I was looking for...
58 >> But also didn't understand the meaning of "a patch in gentoo-portage-dev
59 >> ml"... What does this stand for?
60 >>
61 >> Thanks for your help

Replies