Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 4/4] sync: Add backwards compat with SYNC_{UMASK,USER} variables
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:22:21
Message-Id: 20141207092207.7070d75c@pomiot.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 4/4] sync: Add backwards compat with SYNC_{UMASK,USER} variables by Zac Medico
1 Dnia 2014-12-06, o godz. 23:15:09
2 Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> napisał(a):
3
4 > On 12/05/2014 04:03 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
5 > > Support SYNC_UMASK and SYNC_USER variables that were used in Funtoo
6 > > Portage, as fallbacks to sync-umask and sync-user repo keys.
7 > > ---
8 > > pym/portage/package/ebuild/_config/special_env_vars.py | 2 +-
9 > > pym/portage/package/ebuild/config.py | 12 ++++++++++++
10 > > pym/portage/repository/config.py | 13 +++++++++++++
11 > > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
12 >
13 > Why should we add backward compatibility code for something that was
14 > never supported in the master branch?
15
16 I just thought it wouldn't hurt if we're backporting features.
17
18 --
19 Best regards,
20 Michał Górny

Replies