| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:22:44 +0100
|
| 5 |
Alexander Berntsen <alexander@××××××.net> wrote:
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Your ill-placed attempts at being clever are missing the point. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Why are they missing the point?
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Portage is a mess. We don't need it to become more messy to the point |
| 12 |
> of maintainability. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
How do we plan to fix that?
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Yes, no one fixing bugs (because they are all designing a grand |
| 17 |
> redesign of Portage) would be bad. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Do you agree?
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> However, this is not likely to happen. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Why do you think so?
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> It hasn't happened before. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
It could happen in the future.
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> And now we have a bunch of great new volunteers. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Yes, we do.
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> Sebastian even *told* you specifically how to do this properly. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Where did he?
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
> So please do. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Why?
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
- --
|
| 42 |
With kind regards,
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
|
| 45 |
Gentoo Developer
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
|
| 48 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
|
| 49 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
|
| 50 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 51 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS2GT9AAoJEJWyH81tNOV95ukH+wZ0yB4KOgfOd6z90cpYC0Ec
|
| 54 |
4RLK8HbKVYIIytxnnhR5Ny/BR5/ANlOYQDIFUytkJyKNmVPx3nP6kY+wHD5qOYkF
|
| 55 |
3DlJpxRy6wx/E43+wpvVv+dSNDHxkvyy8OeZ5QuAcFi1oYaeYdctfOU4/URihGzO
|
| 56 |
MjA5h0ydQ8CcHoTMkJsFjS7wL3HdSy1m1SRh9kiOuOr9hz4HqOImjJQ1/6Yb38uS
|
| 57 |
MVewW2oMEnEB99UANB5CswZHvvHcxU6d4hSmKlL1DfEuEq8hodM552n+WqpTgRhW
|
| 58 |
YzLmhUFqe0fkS9p4wAa5tPDB8O34P+nEvSAwtVqDFwqJmX0+H+r2INp7LJmDARo=
|
| 59 |
=FaJT
|
| 60 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives