Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] September team meeting
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 01:22:39
Message-Id: 20140903182234.2e9d9d4f.dolsen@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] September team meeting by Alexander Berntsen
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:02:13 +0200
5 Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> wrote:
6
7 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
8 > Hash: SHA256
9 >
10 > Friends, here is the meeting summary:
11 >
12 >
13 > - -We'll merge the fakeroot patches[0].
14 >
15 > - -Trofi's repoman patch is mostly OK as far as Michał and I are
16 > concerned. I will respond to his thread on the ML. Tom or whoever's
17 > doing repoman now needs to ACK it. So does some QA member (e.g. Tom).
18 >
19 > - -That guy's uncooperative root patch, Martin Vaeth's dynamic
20 > dependencies patch and Michael Haubenwallner's unstable eclasses stuff
21 > are all NACKed by me and Michàl. They are messy WIP patches, that
22 > either way need to go through PMS and/or QA before we do anything
23 > about them.
24 >
25 > - -Michał NACKed my autounmask patch. I don't particularly care, but I
26 > need someone to ACK it before I merge it...
27 >
28
29 Sorry, I will probably ack your recent one, but I'm not sure which it
30 is atm... I don't think I saw your latest enough/don't remember it atm.
31
32
33 > - -Michał's slot op patch needs to go through QA.
34 >
35 > - -We can finish pkg_pretend() even if a package dies... I'll get on
36 > that sometime. But RE [1]: this is intended behaviour.
37 >
38 > - -I ACKed all of Michał's setup.py stuff, but Brian needs to review
39 > it before Michał commits it.
40 >
41
42 I've tested the heck out of it. I have edited the ebuild and gotten
43 everything working for catalyst. I believe Michal has a few more man
44 pages to get version updated by setup.py. With those done, it should
45 be good to go.
46
47 > - -Michał is going to get his bash-completion QA check patch ready and
48 > committed at some point, and then move onto refactoring stuff there
49 > into separate files. Finally, he'll initiate a big bikeshed on the
50 > dev-ML about moving files to gx86... See the various bash completion
51 > threads he's made to dev ML and portage ML lately. There are a few of
52 > them, so it's outside of the scope of this summary.
53 >
54
55 Done and merged.
56
57 >
58 > So to sum up: We're being PMS-compliant, and respectful towards QA by
59 > not doing anything. ;-)
60 >
61
62 s/not doing anything./not doing much. ;-)
63
64 > [0] <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=489016>
65 > [1] <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404157>
66 > - --
67 > Alexander
68 > bernalex@g.o
69
70 Let's see if we can get another release out the weekend of Sept 13-14
71
72 So, how about another meeting for finalizing that Next
73 Wednesday/Thursday? But hopefully not in the early UTC hours.
74
75 Any time after 1300 UTC will work best. It is Europe evening/early
76 night. Early morning N.A Pacific which works for me. Seems that's
77 when we a all on IRC at the same time most days.
78
79 - --
80 Brian Dolbec <dolsen>
81
82 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
83 Version: GnuPG v2.0
84
85 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUB77aXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
86 ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4Njg4RkQxQ0M3MUMxQzA0RUFFQTQyMzcy
87 MjE0RDkwQTAxNEYxN0NCAAoJECIU2QoBTxfLu/AH/0BtyFbP9FbsbuE2bt5HdzEm
88 EsIY9Fv8GkSUeqTDZ9yhAhzgAvTez5WGsPUT60SBnqsqYhVNvuKNomlf4HRCAYDB
89 YLwHZQJscl9owQNbWDQ3FhuKTRc1kzLNAR30jNjwImRaH65w1h7UCCA3fKkqpcTE
90 VyAIqUhGe7nQx7h7AulcRnifKoFhKM78OSHU+QkU2jMa1WlGjPBUpeylS7MEdomm
91 M+/z/HcgI8WNSAWXna0Hagtm0m3EbNamPw4MyzjV0CQYcGAajRotrjCe3EP+IGzJ
92 j81/nzP3yiyI75uxvdgLnciQSLD1yMhvdBJKWL7j2axpIOVJQCXn6GFKRBCnlAg=
93 =ASrk
94 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----