| 1 |
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 05:59:54PM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:51:14 -0800 W. Trevor King wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:40:19PM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:32:35 -0800 W. Trevor King wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > No policy/suggestion/goal is going to be followed 100% of the |
| 6 |
> > > > time. |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > This way, it seems preferable to use the mailing list when |
| 9 |
> > > blaming. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Unless some of the discussion happened on IRC. There are several |
| 12 |
> > possible channels for patch discussion, but only one commit |
| 13 |
> > message per patch. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Exactly, without knowledge codification all that will continue to be |
| 16 |
> a "feel like", "probably not", "shouldn't", "unless some". |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I don't see that as a problem. I guess I just have more faith that |
| 19 |
current devs will put in a reasonable best-effort without codification |
| 20 |
beyond “here are some conventions you may want to use”, and that |
| 21 |
future devs will be competent enough to still be productive in the |
| 22 |
face of unhelpful commit messages. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Cheers, |
| 25 |
Trevor |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). |
| 29 |
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy |
Archives