| 1 |
On Oct 17, 2004, at 12:25, Brian wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 20:01 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> So, let the suggestions roll. :) |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Regards, |
| 7 |
>> Jason Stubbs |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Dan has been the porthole developer that has done the most integrating |
| 10 |
> portage modules for porthole's use, but it looks like we are loosing |
| 11 |
> him |
| 12 |
> from gentoo for now. I have not had much reason to think about how |
| 13 |
> much |
| 14 |
> more we might need from portage. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I think Jason and I talked about this somewhat a while back. It was |
| 17 |
actually Fredrik Arnerup that did most of the work with portagelib (I |
| 18 |
originally used file system calls to get portage info, which is bad bad |
| 19 |
bad!). I'm not sure he's on this list so you may want to mail him. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
And just so everyone knows, I have moved away from Gentoo and towards |
| 22 |
debian-based distributions because of my current situation. I am sorry, |
| 23 |
but life has to move on, and I need to spend more time on my studies |
| 24 |
now. Debian is just faster and easier for me. I will try and |
| 25 |
participate as well as I can, though, and try to stay active on the |
| 26 |
various mailing lists and help out if I can. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I need to go now, but expect another email from me about this stuff |
| 29 |
after I get a chance to read it. I think the interfacing with portage |
| 30 |
can be made MUCH better for third party application developers. |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Daniel G. Taylor |
| 33 |
http://programmer-art.org |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives