1 |
Paul Bredbury wrote: |
2 |
>> Go find a mathematician and discuss this matter with him. Tell him what you told |
3 |
>> me, and he will slap you with a large frying pan. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Here's a non-programming example, to make things clearer. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> It's a sunny Sunday, and Fred is watching a labourer trying to build a |
8 |
> house with a shovel. An hour later, Jane comes along and asks Fred |
9 |
> whether the labourer has built any houses *with* that shovel. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Fred does not say: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> "Hang on! With *that* shovel? I dunno. Possibly. Who can say?" |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Fred does say: |
16 |
> |
17 |
> "Dudess, that labourer hasn't built any houses." |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Implicit in that is: |
20 |
> |
21 |
> "Dudess, regardless of the building tool, no houses have been built." |
22 |
|
23 |
Look, you can introduce a thousand other metaphors, it won't prove your point |
24 |
more right. We don't need metaphors to understand what you want to say. Fact is |
25 |
just that so far 5 people disagree with you and zero agree with you. So maybe |
26 |
you should just accept that 5 times more people think another solution is more |
27 |
appropriate and stop inventing nice stories. |
28 |
|
29 |
</rant> |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Kind Regards, |
33 |
|
34 |
Simon Stelling |
35 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer |
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |