Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] use.force and package.use.force (bug #142853)
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:39:54
Message-Id: 44D76777.2040700@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] use.force and package.use.force (bug #142853) by Zac Medico
1 Zac Medico wrote:
2 > Alec Warner wrote:
3 >>> Zac Medico wrote:
4 >>>
5 >>>> Users can unforce them via /etc/portage/profile/{use.force,package.use.force} in the usual "-flag" way.
6 >>> Why new files? Why isn't this just pushed into the use stacking order
7 >>> over-ridable by the user (default USE flags, and not forcing)?
8 >
9 > Much like use.mask, which is for flags that almost certainly should _not_ be enabled, use.force is for flags that almost certainly _should_ enable.
10 >
11 >>> Then they can over-ride it in package.use just like they do now?
12 >
13 > Again, it's akin to use.mask, and protects the user from accidentally doing something that they almost certainly shouldn't do (though they have the option to override it if absolutely necessary).
14 >
15 > Zac
16
17 hrm, so not default use flags then.
18 --
19 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list