Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Is portage (/usr)/bin-merge safe? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 01 Jun 2013 05:49:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 51A98B4E.8090601@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-portage-dev] Is portage (/usr)/bin-merge safe? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | On 05/31/2013 10:36 PM, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 | > As in subject, is portage bin/usr-bin merge safe? |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > It appears most of my clashing files are /usr/bin/* -> /bin/* symlinks. |
| 5 | > (That's just bin, I've not looked at sbin.) |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I haven't tried it, but it should work just fine. Portage has always |
| 8 | supported directory symlinks like these. I haven't heard any recent |
| 9 | complaints regarding them. |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Thanks, |
| 12 | Zac |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Is portage (/usr)/bin-merge safe? | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |