Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Jason Mobarak <aether@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-ng i18n?
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:21:29
Message-Id: 20031230081356.GB12956@unm.edu
1 On 18:14 Fri 26 Dec , Spatz wrote:
2 > Current portage has all strings written in the code...
3 > To internationalize an application means it reads all strings (everything it
4 > outputs to the screen/terminal/etc.) from an external file, depending on the
5 > locale (gnu gives us gettext to get this done easily) and then outputs it,
6 > the same way kde/gnome is being internationalized.
7 >
8 > On Thursday 25 December 2003 00:07, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote:
9 > > I don't see any real problems. Could you be a little bit more exact of
10 > > what is lacking in current portage to achieve this?
11 > >
12 > > Pieter
13 > >
14
15 The current portage spec lists a component based design as goal for portage,
16 constructing an i18n emerge-like tool would present less difficulty if
17 portage-ng has a good component design.
18
19
20 --
21 -------------------------~
22 ----------Jason-A-Mobarak-~
23 -aether-at-gentoo-dot-org-~
24 -------------------------~
25
26
27 --
28 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-ng i18n? foser <foser@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-ng i18n? Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@g.o>