Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] dispatch-conf
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 12:42:35
Message-Id: 20050602134218.11c275d5@snowdrop
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] dispatch-conf by Jason Stubbs
1 On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:31:17 +0900 Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 | On Thursday 02 June 2005 21:12, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
4 | > Make it a PDEPEND of portage. Much cleaner.
5 |
6 | I won't argue on the merits of virtuals compared to direct
7 | dependencies, but why do you choose PDEPEND?
8
9 Because portage currently always pulls in RDEPENDs before the main
10 package, and because it makes figuring out system / bootstrap deps much
11 easier if portage has as little as possible being pulled in before it.
12
13 --
14 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
15 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
16 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] dispatch-conf Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>