Archives
Archives
| From: | Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Bugzilla Bug 112779: New and Improved Way to Handle /etc/portage | ||
| Date: | Tue, 22 Nov 2005 02:19:12 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20051122021831.GB4600@nightcrawler | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Bugzilla Bug 112779: New and Improved Way to Handle /etc/portage by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | Will review the patch in a bit, but... |
| 2 | |
| 3 | On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 05:14:55PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 4 | > With this variable you can set a |
| 5 | > space separated list of directories (if you leave out /etc/portage then it |
| 6 | > will _not_ be included). |
| 7 | Kind of a gotcha there. Additionaly, no go on spaces, too easy for |
| 8 | odd paths to trigger an issue (OSX's /Volumes mounting names fex will |
| 9 | be an issue). |
| 10 | ~harring |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Bugzilla Bug 112779: New and Improved Way to Handle /etc/portage | "Michael Stewart (vericgar)" <vericgar@g.o> |