| 1 |
On Sunday 30 October 2005 01:03, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> The following simple patch adds the ability for to run a userside |
| 3 |
> post_sync script, right now it's only used with rsync but the idea could |
| 4 |
> be adopted rather easy for other methods of transfer that portage may |
| 5 |
> use. The basic idea is to be able to preform a set of maintenance tasks |
| 6 |
> right after sync up with an rsync server. Be that adding a call to svn |
| 7 |
> co, cvs co, ebuild manipulation, updating search caches or other. I've |
| 8 |
> been using this method on and off sense about portage-2.0.51.16 without |
| 9 |
> any problems. Any comments before I file a bug for inclusion? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
This really goes hand in hand with the pre/post phase hooks patch. That patch, |
| 12 |
however, implements hooks as bash functions rather than external executables. |
| 13 |
The discrepancy there should probably be worked out before either are |
| 14 |
included. Personally, I'm for the external executable method but I'm sure |
| 15 |
that there will be alternative opinions... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives