Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:25:13 |
| Message-Id: | 443A2461.1010609@gentoo.org |
| 1 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 | Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Hi everyone, |
| 5 | |
| 6 | What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any trouble with them. Are there any arguments against making them default? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Zac |
| 9 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 10 | Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 11 | |
| 12 | iD8DBQFEOiRf/ejvha5XGaMRAn+kAJ9ieh37OjEwTriDQt/xPnmMGqEPsQCg7qvf |
| 13 | XEcYhyzdGSDBj8HtH8QYJzk= |
| 14 | =ge1C |
| 15 | -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? | Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |