| 1 |
El lun, 28-05-2012 a las 00:49 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 05/27/2012 03:27 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I have seen today a fixed bug that was only reproducible for people |
| 4 |
> > (like me) running without userpriv (but maintainer didn't found it |
| 5 |
> > before commiting because he was running with this feature enabled), I |
| 6 |
> > have also seen some packages skipping tests when not using userpriv. I |
| 7 |
> > am unsure then, why default is still to not use userpriv? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I think it's not enabled by default just because there's always risk |
| 10 |
> involved in changing the defaults. I've been using it for years and I |
| 11 |
> don't remember experiencing any problems because of it. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> > I haven't |
| 14 |
> > found important bugs opened pointing regressions but, since it's still |
| 15 |
> > disabled by default, I am still running in the old way instead of using |
| 16 |
> > "userpriv usersandbox" :/ |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I plan to send an email to the gentoo-dev mailing list, to ask if there |
| 19 |
> are any objections to having FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" enabled by |
| 20 |
> default. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Well, thanks a lot :D |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
It's really a pleasure to discuss with you :) |
Archives