Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: fix bug #526160
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 16:50:15
Message-Id: 20141102084918.6fd6251d.dolsen@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: fix bug #526160 by zmedico@gentoo.org
1 On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 18:05:54 -0700
2 zmedico@g.o wrote:
3
4 > From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
5 >
6 > This fixes _dep_check_composite_db to mask packages that aren't the
7 > highest visible match, but only if an update is desirable. This causes
8 > desirable updates to get pulled in for cases like bug #526160. The
9 > included unit test simulates the virtual/pypy update that triggered
10 > the bug.
11 >
12 > X-Gentoo-Bug: 526160
13 > X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=526160
14 > ---
15 > pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 21 ++++++++
16 > pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_virtual_slot.py | 66
17 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
18 >
19
20 Looks good, merge away
21
22
23 --
24 Brian Dolbec <dolsen>