| 1 |
On Thu, 2005-10-11 at 11:09 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I don't know whether all of you read my blog, but I wanted to make sure |
| 6 |
> you saw this: |
| 7 |
> http://www.livejournal.com/users/spyderous/60809.html?thread=89737#t89737. |
| 8 |
> It's a reply from the author of a book on why he rated our package |
| 9 |
> management at a 4 instead of a 5, and it gives some good ideas on where |
| 10 |
> users feel things could improve. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Feel free to ignore the binary packages bit, as that's more of a Gentoo |
| 13 |
> philosophical issue. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Thanks, |
| 16 |
> Donnie |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
GUI wise, porthole-0.5.0 is much improved over previous versions. It |
| 19 |
runs very smooth now with hick-ups a rarity. :) All We are waiting for |
| 20 |
now is some last minute translation updates for it's next release. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
With all the changes and bug fixes I see in my mail these days, by this |
| 23 |
time next year things will have improved a whole bunch. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Keep up the good work :) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Brian <dol-sen@×××××.net> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives