| 1 |
Thanks for the feedback. I'll post over on gentoo-dev and see how it |
| 2 |
goes. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Some suggested change logs were the place to look. I reviewed a few |
| 5 |
after the fact, and did not find the types of usage issues I ran into. |
| 6 |
It looks like the Gentoo change logs are focused on ebuild issues rather |
| 7 |
than functional issues inherent in the software. Makes sense to me. I |
| 8 |
expect to find similar in the software change logs, although those are |
| 9 |
sometimes more difficult to locate. I maintain that the best source of |
| 10 |
breaking news is the Gentoo User Forum. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
>From this exchange, I gather that something similar to what I'm |
| 13 |
describing already exists yet is underutilized? What would that be? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Best Regards, |
| 16 |
Craig. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 09:21 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 20 |
> On Sunday 10 July 2005 08:05, Drake Wyrm wrote: |
| 21 |
> > Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> wrote: |
| 22 |
> > > You're on the wrong list for this. The thread should be on |
| 23 |
> > > gentoo-dev@g.o. |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > What he was requesting, additional capability for Portage, probably |
| 26 |
> > belonged here. On the other hand, a discussion on how to convince devs |
| 27 |
> > to make use of the existing capabilities would probably be welcome on |
| 28 |
> > gentoo-dev or, perhaps, gentoo-qa. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Exactly. Doesn't matter what the nice feature is, if it's not used... |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Regards, |
| 33 |
> Jason Stubbs |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives