Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] GPG signed commits
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:59:17
Message-Id: 544A14E3.2010107@gentoo.org
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 Friends,
5
6 I accidentally pushed a GPG signed commit. This isn't a problem;
7 merely pointless at this stage, as it won't be used.
8
9 But following this accident I thought I should ask, is it OK to just
10 start GPG signing commits now? It's default in my git now, and I do it
11 for almost all other projects anyway, and it doesn't exactly hurt
12 anyone. And, hey, in the future, maybe we'll start using the
13 signatures too.
14
15 Note that I'm not suggesting we start *requiring* GPG signed commits
16 as of yet. :-]
17
18 Brian, what do you think?
19 - --
20 Alexander
21 bernalex@g.o
22 https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
23 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
24 Version: GnuPG v2
25 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
26
27 iF4EAREIAAYFAlRKFOMACgkQRtClrXBQc7V5jQD/eOkGG94+bbLpsVhs7iwXEAsI
28 amzCJ5MiEiWoVSrySQcA/0TAyIySo360k0KZmDEhXBEylyunZl4oSMfcc7U5VGi6
29 =TVRR
30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] GPG signed commits Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>