1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
3 |
|
4 |
Friends, |
5 |
|
6 |
I accidentally pushed a GPG signed commit. This isn't a problem; |
7 |
merely pointless at this stage, as it won't be used. |
8 |
|
9 |
But following this accident I thought I should ask, is it OK to just |
10 |
start GPG signing commits now? It's default in my git now, and I do it |
11 |
for almost all other projects anyway, and it doesn't exactly hurt |
12 |
anyone. And, hey, in the future, maybe we'll start using the |
13 |
signatures too. |
14 |
|
15 |
Note that I'm not suggesting we start *requiring* GPG signed commits |
16 |
as of yet. :-] |
17 |
|
18 |
Brian, what do you think? |
19 |
- -- |
20 |
Alexander |
21 |
bernalex@g.o |
22 |
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander |
23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
24 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
25 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
26 |
|
27 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlRKFOMACgkQRtClrXBQc7V5jQD/eOkGG94+bbLpsVhs7iwXEAsI |
28 |
amzCJ5MiEiWoVSrySQcA/0TAyIySo360k0KZmDEhXBEylyunZl4oSMfcc7U5VGi6 |
29 |
=TVRR |
30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |