Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Markus Duft <mduft@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] --nodeps faulty behaviour?
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:22:14
Message-Id: 1240217927.1512.10.camel@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] --nodeps faulty behaviour? by Markus Duft
1 On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 08:35 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
2 > Hi!
3 >
4 > I have a quick question: is --nodeps supposed to still merge packages in
5 > the right order?
6 >
7 > my specific problem is, that when i do this:
8 >
9 > emerge -pv --noreplace --oneshot --nodeps \
10 > sys-devel/gcc-config \
11 > sys-devel/gcc \
12 > libperl perl help2man texinfo \
13 > "=autoconf-2.1*" "=autoconf-2.6*" "autoconf-wrapper" \
14 > "=automake-1.4*" "=automake-1.5*" "=automake-1.6*" \
15 > "=automake-1.7*" "=automake-1.8*" "automake-wrapper" \
16 > wget
17 >
18 > i get this:
19 >
20 > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
21 >
22 > [ebuild N ] sys-apps/texinfo-4.12 USE="-nls -static" 0 kB
23 > [ebuild N ] sys-devel/autoconf-2.13 0 kB
24 > [ebuild N ] sys-devel/autoconf-2.63-r1 USE="(-emacs)" 0 kB
25 > [ebuild N ] sys-devel/automake-1.4_p6 0 kB
26 > [ebuild N ] sys-devel/automake-1.5 0 kB
27 > [ebuild N ] sys-devel/automake-1.6.3 0 kB
28 > [ebuild N ] sys-devel/automake-1.7.9-r1 0 kB
29 > [ebuild N ] sys-devel/automake-1.8.5-r3 0 kB
30 > [ebuild N ] net-misc/wget-1.11.4 USE="-debug (-ipv6) -nls -socks5
31 > -ssl -static" 0 kB
32 > [ebuild N ] sys-devel/gcc-config-1.4.1-r00.1 0 kB
33 > [ebuild N ] sys-devel/libperl-5.8.8-r2 USE="-berkdb -debug -gdbm
34 > -ithreads" 0 kB
35 > [ebuild N ] dev-lang/perl-5.8.8-r5 USE="-berkdb -build -debug -doc
36 > -gdbm -ithreads -perlsuid" 0 kB
37 > [ebuild N ] sys-apps/help2man-1.36.4 USE="-nls" 0 kB
38 > [ebuild N ] sys-devel/autoconf-wrapper-6-r00.1 0 kB
39 > [ebuild N ] sys-devel/automake-wrapper-3-r1 0 kB
40 >
41 >
42 > but texinfo DEPENDs on help2man - thus it fails to build. as a workaroun
43 > i split the merges into several ones which preserve dependency order,
44 > but i feel that portage should do it.. what do you think?
45 >
46
47 oh, damn, sorry; this is not the right portage, was in the wrong
48 shell :) this is the right one:
49
50 Portage 2.2.00.13286-prefix
51 (!/opt/gentoo/usr/portage/profiles/prefix/windows/interix/5.2/x86,
52 gcc-4.2.4, unavailable, 5.2 x86)
53 =================================================================
54 System uname: Interix-5.2-x86-32bit
55 Timestamp of tree: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:02:48 +0000
56 app-shells/bash: 3.2_p48-r1
57 dev-lang/python: 2.5.4-r2, 2.6.1-r1
58 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.63-r1
59 sys-devel/automake: 1.9.6-r2, 1.10.2-r00.1
60 sys-devel/binutils: 2.18-r4
61 sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.4.1-r00.1
62 sys-devel/libtool: 2.2.6a
63 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86-interix"
64 ...
65
66 > Administrator opt $ emerge --info
67 > Portage 2.2.00.13346-prefix (prefix/windows/interix/5.2/x86, gcc-4.2.4,
68 > unavailable, 5.2 x86)
69 > =================================================================
70 > System uname: Interix-5.2-x86-32bit
71 > Timestamp of tree: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:36:49 +0000
72 > app-shells/bash: 3.2_p48-r1
73 > dev-lang/python: 2.5.4-r2, 2.6.1-r1
74 > sys-devel/autoconf: 2.63-r1
75 > sys-devel/automake: 1.9.6-r2, 1.10.2-r00.1
76 > sys-devel/binutils: 2.18-r4
77 > sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.4.1-r00.1
78 > sys-devel/libtool: 2.2.6a
79 > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86-interix"
80 > ....
81 >
82 > Cheers, Markus
83 >
84 >