Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla "Feature" Bugs
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 16:36:38
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla "Feature" Bugs by Jason Stubbs
1 On 01/07/04 Jason Stubbs wrote:
3 > Hi all,
4 >
5 > I've just been going through some of the unresolved bugs and have
6 > found(especially in the earlier bug #s) that there are many feature
7 > requests that are unresolved. I'm thinking it would be a good idea to
8 > create a "master" bug for portage-ng and then make it depend on all of
9 > these unresolved feature requests. Pros? It would make it easy to
10 > confirm that there's nothing missing from the reqspec and also make it
11 > easy to close many (hundreds?) of bugs on portage-ng's completion.
12 > Cons? Massive amount of deps from a single bug. Thoughts?
14 Actually there already is a bug for that, check for "portage 3".
15 Although it is not really used lately.
17 Marius
19 --
20 Public Key at
22 In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
23 Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla "Feature" Bugs Jason Stubbs <jasonstubbs@×××××.com>