| 1 |
On 01/07/04 Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Hi all, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I've just been going through some of the unresolved bugs and have |
| 6 |
> found(especially in the earlier bug #s) that there are many feature |
| 7 |
> requests that are unresolved. I'm thinking it would be a good idea to |
| 8 |
> create a "master" bug for portage-ng and then make it depend on all of |
| 9 |
> these unresolved feature requests. Pros? It would make it easy to |
| 10 |
> confirm that there's nothing missing from the reqspec and also make it |
| 11 |
> easy to close many (hundreds?) of bugs on portage-ng's completion. |
| 12 |
> Cons? Massive amount of deps from a single bug. Thoughts? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Actually there already is a bug for that, check for "portage 3". |
| 15 |
Although it is not really used lately. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Marius |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 23 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives