| 1 |
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:27:49AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 04/24/2010 11:00 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Am 24.04.2010 13:32, schrieb Gentoo: |
| 4 |
> >> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 22:31 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> On 04/23/2010 05:43 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote: |
| 6 |
> >>>> Someone might come up with some logic to detect new use flags in |
| 7 |
> >>>> *DEPEND, but this looks like a hack to me. |
| 8 |
> >>> |
| 9 |
> >>> It doesn't seem too bad to me. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > It doesn't work, because it's not guaranteed, that only use flag from |
| 12 |
> > IUSE are used in use conditionals. That means you can't do it reliably |
| 13 |
> > without the unevaluated value. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> We can and should add a check to repoman to enforce this. It's long |
| 16 |
> overdue. The flags already cannot be enabled unless they are in |
| 17 |
> IUSE, since portage filters them (except for special things like |
| 18 |
> use.force). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Offhand, the tree should be clean on this account- pcheck has scanned |
| 21 |
for it since near day one. You also need to scan LICENSE, SRC_URI, |
| 22 |
and RESTRICT btw. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
~brian |
Archives