1 |
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:08:20 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>It's not getting along at all, we're concentrating our efforts on the |
4 |
>current portage. Right now I consider portage-ng a dead project. |
5 |
|
6 |
ok I propose that the one who can update the pages should do that :-) |
7 |
|
8 |
Now maybe I should write why I asked for it: I would like to use portage on |
9 |
another platform. I am admin of an open source project for OS/2 (no, not dead |
10 |
yet) and we have our unix layer as well. So far some guys did their own way |
11 |
or portage, unfortunately not a very flexible one. At work I use Gentoo |
12 |
nowadays and portage is a great tool so I thought migrating our ports to |
13 |
portage would be nice. |
14 |
|
15 |
What about the limitations in portage that are listed on the portage-ng page? |
16 |
Do you think it should be possible to get it to work on other platforms than |
17 |
Linux within a reasonable time? Where could I run into problems? Are there |
18 |
still people working on portage for Fink or BSD? |
19 |
|
20 |
cu |
21 |
|
22 |
Adrian |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |