1 |
On 04-12-2021 10:24:23 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 2021-12-04 at 10:15 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
3 |
> > On 04-12-2021 10:13:09 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Sat, 2021-12-04 at 09:56 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
5 |
> > > > Why don't you change your color.map instead of changing the default for |
6 |
> > > > everyone? |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > Why should we keep a stupid default? Should we optimize Gentoo for |
9 |
> > > people who don't want to be able to read Portage's output? |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > You're assuming everyone uses the terminal in the way you do. I simply |
12 |
> > don't think that's how the world looks like. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> On the other hand, you're assuming that everyone uses the terminal |
15 |
> in the way you do. |
16 |
|
17 |
It eludes me how you came to that conclusion. |
18 |
|
19 |
> > No need for calling things stupid, IMO. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Using dark blue on black background is stupid. |
22 |
|
23 |
... then don't use black background or dark blue text? |
24 |
|
25 |
Now, if you would make a supported claim that all terminals we install |
26 |
use a black background by default, your change becomes more valid. |
27 |
|
28 |
However, we then still don't know if people leave that default or use |
29 |
something else, but we could make some educated guess about the amount |
30 |
of people not changing the default. |
31 |
|
32 |
My point, because I think this wasn't clear to you, is and always was, |
33 |
how many people is this change going to be disruptive to. And should |
34 |
we make a hint to users when they install this version of Portage that |
35 |
they can revert/change this by altering color.map (and how)? |
36 |
|
37 |
Thanks, |
38 |
Fabian |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Fabian Groffen |
43 |
Gentoo on a different level |