Archives
Archives
| From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] INSTALL_MASK refurbishing resubmit | ||
| Date: | Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:03:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1521363780.1430.1.camel@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] INSTALL_MASK refurbishing resubmit by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | W dniu czw, 15.03.2018 o godzinie 22∶10 -0700, użytkownik Zac Medico |
| 2 | napisał: |
| 3 | > A binary package should |
| 4 | > use the value of INSTALL_MASK that existed at build time. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Wait a minute! This doesn't make any sense. The whole point of having |
| 8 | separate PKG_INSTALL_MASK and INSTALL_MASK is to be able to strip stuff |
| 9 | from more complete binary packages, not to force original restrictions |
| 10 | forever. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Best regards, |
| 14 | Michał Górny |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] INSTALL_MASK refurbishing resubmit | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] INSTALL_MASK refurbishing resubmit | Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@××××××××.com> |