Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:10:08
Message-Id: 1338845191.23212.2.camel@belkin4
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue by Zac Medico
1 El lun, 04-06-2012 a las 13:44 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
2 > On 06/04/2012 04:57 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
3 > > - Looks like there is no consensus about what to do and, then, this
4 > > could probably be implemented on eapi... 7? While former could probably
5 > > be implemented much sooner (probably even in eapi5)
6 >
7 > Ciaran has been advocating "SLOT operator" dependencies for this, but
8 > those are not designed to work with unslotted packages, which leads to
9 > the issues discussed in bug 414955:
10 >
11 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414955#c10
12 >
13 > The gentoo-dev mailing list would be a better place to discuss this,
14 > since this issue affects the whole developer community.
15
16 Just sent to gentoo-dev ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature