| 1 |
On 2/20/20 9:29 PM, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 2 |
> @@ -564,7 +577,22 @@ def findPackages( |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> # Exclude if binpkg exists in the porttree and not --deep |
| 5 |
> if not destructive and port_dbapi.cpv_exists(cpv): |
| 6 |
> - continue |
| 7 |
> + if not options['changed-deps']: |
| 8 |
> + continue |
| 9 |
> + |
| 10 |
> + uselist = bin_dbapi.aux_get(cpv, ['USE'])[0].split() |
| 11 |
> + all_equal = True |
| 12 |
> + |
| 13 |
> + for k in ('RDEPEND', 'PDEPEND'): |
| 14 |
> + binpkg_deps = bin_dbapi.aux_get(cpv, [k]) |
| 15 |
> + ebuild_deps = port_dbapi.aux_get(cpv, [k]) |
| 16 |
> + |
| 17 |
> + if not _deps_equal(binpkg_deps, ebuild_deps, cpv.eapi, uselist): |
| 18 |
> + all_equal = False |
| 19 |
> + break |
| 20 |
> + |
| 21 |
> + if all_equal: |
| 22 |
> + continue |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
If all_equal is True, then none of the other filters have an opportunity |
| 25 |
to add this package to the dead_binpkgs set. That's not good is it? |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Thanks, |
| 28 |
Zac |
Archives