| 1 |
On Sun, July 25, 2004 5:58 pm, John Nilsson said: |
| 2 |
> Why not drop global useflags entierly? |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> There really is no reason for them. Extend euse to modify |
| 5 |
> /etc/portage/packages.use. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I think it is time to begin decentralizing the system now. Portage is |
| 8 |
> getting rather large and will probably be broken up into pieces in the |
| 9 |
> future. If ebuilds didn't have to concider some global useflag namespace |
| 10 |
> it would be eaiser to sync diffrent vendors trees. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> -John |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
:( so instead of adding USE="gnome" to make.conf, i would have to check |
| 17 |
every package i emerge to see if it uses the 'gnome', |
| 18 |
'gnomelib','gnome-integratoin', or w/e other local use flag (since the |
| 19 |
names wouldn't be standardized) and add those to /etc/portage/package.use? |
| 20 |
that one file could get *really* big, I use *alot* of USE flags |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Joseph Booker |
| 24 |
joe @ irc.neoturbine.net |
| 25 |
jj110888 @ irc.freenode.net |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives