From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.defaults: negative incrementals in USE_EXPAND (530222) | ||
Date: | Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:09:42 | ||
Message-Id: | 5476EA52.4050100@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.defaults: negative incrementals in USE_EXPAND (530222) by Brian Dolbec |
1 | On 11/26/2014 11:46 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
2 | > This code looks fine. As for the test, I know you know what you are |
3 | > doing :) |
4 | > |
5 | > LGTM |
6 | |
7 | Thank you. I've pushed a simplified version of the same patch: |
8 | |
9 | https://github.com/gentoo/portage/commit/b9c06a6a2dd4ccc875f8b9dd3139ea582e1e5621 |
10 | |
11 | My first attempt at simplifying it unexpectedly broke the test in |
12 | pym/portage/tests/ebuild/test_doebuild_fd_pipes.py: |
13 | |
14 | https://travis-ci.org/gentoo/portage/builds/42280811 |
15 | |
16 | I'm really curious about how such a strange result could be triggered... |
17 | -- |
18 | Thanks, |
19 | Zac |