Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.defaults: negative incrementals in USE_EXPAND (530222)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:09:42
Message-Id: 5476EA52.4050100@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.defaults: negative incrementals in USE_EXPAND (530222) by Brian Dolbec
1 On 11/26/2014 11:46 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
2 > This code looks fine. As for the test, I know you know what you are
3 > doing :)
4 >
5 > LGTM
6
7 Thank you. I've pushed a simplified version of the same patch:
8
9 https://github.com/gentoo/portage/commit/b9c06a6a2dd4ccc875f8b9dd3139ea582e1e5621
10
11 My first attempt at simplifying it unexpectedly broke the test in
12 pym/portage/tests/ebuild/test_doebuild_fd_pipes.py:
13
14 https://travis-ci.org/gentoo/portage/builds/42280811
15
16 I'm really curious about how such a strange result could be triggered...
17 --
18 Thanks,
19 Zac