1 |
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 11:17, Ned Ludd wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
3 |
> > Okay, new suggestion. |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods |
6 |
> > necessary to fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is. |
7 |
> > That would be 2.0.54 as per the attached patch. Get that out soon and get |
8 |
> > trunk out masked at around the same time. As soon as 2.0.54 goes stable |
9 |
> > put trunk into ~arch. However, instead of ~arch meaning "regression fixes |
10 |
> > only" we could just limit it to "minor changes only" (ie. no big |
11 |
> > refactorings, rewrites or similar high risk changes) until it is time to |
12 |
> > stable it. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I think it would be wise to reconsider the cache fixes. I know you have |
15 |
> been away from irc for a while now and have missed the daily events, |
16 |
> but most of the people we have interacted with are expecting the cache |
17 |
> updates in .54 (alot of people complaining about the hanging at 50%) |
18 |
|
19 |
Call me wrong, but I'm feeling that the constant pulling and pushing on IRC |
20 |
causes many misjudgements. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Jason Stubbs |
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |