| 1 |
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 08:22:31PM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:18:39 -0800 W. Trevor King wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I'm all for recording suggested conventions in DEVELOPING, but I |
| 4 |
> > don't think it's worth the trouble to over-specify the conditions |
| 5 |
> > under which each tag should be used, or to lay out consequences |
| 6 |
> > for cases where they're forgotten. The faith part is trusting |
| 7 |
> > devs to understand and apply the written suggestions, not in |
| 8 |
> > determining what the suggestions are. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Which brings me back to my very first words of this sub thread: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Either someone cares about the background of a patch or he/she |
| 13 |
> doesn't. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
That's certainly true. My initial impression was that you were |
| 16 |
against suggesting these conventions in DEVELOPING. Perhaps I |
| 17 |
missunderstood. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Cheers, |
| 20 |
Trevor |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). |
| 24 |
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy |
Archives