1 |
On Aug 15, 2004, at 8:00 AM, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Apologies if this was received already |
4 |
> |
5 |
|
6 |
> On Monday 09 August 2004 02:44, Kapil Thangavelu wrote: |
7 |
>> i wanted to try out some of the portageng and portage modifications |
8 |
>> that |
9 |
>> are being done in gentoo cvs.. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> May I ask what are your plans are? I don't wish to be intrusive, but |
12 |
> it's not |
13 |
> quite just yet ready widespread testing (=breaking and many reports of |
14 |
> what I |
15 |
> already know). |
16 |
|
17 |
i was interested in working on the system, as it looked to me to be the |
18 |
first real attempt at putting a useable api ontop of portage. and i |
19 |
have some interest in using it for some projects instead of continuing |
20 |
with something homebrewed. iotw. no i wasnt planning on installing it |
21 |
and bitching about how it broke my system ;-) |
22 |
|
23 |
>> however its not clear how these can be accessed.. namely i'd like to |
24 |
>> do |
25 |
>> anonymous checkout of |
26 |
>> http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/portage-mod/?root=gentoo-src |
27 |
> |
28 |
> The standard way would be to grab each file, but if you visit |
29 |
> #gentoo-portage |
30 |
> on irc.freenode.net, I might be able to help you further. |
31 |
> |
32 |
the download one file at a time is pretty lame, i'll be on the channel |
33 |
(seems deserted) for the next few days. |
34 |
|
35 |
> By the way, I prefer to not think of it as portage-ng. There is |
36 |
> nothing new in |
37 |
> most of it and way more code than I wanted there to be. As soon as I |
38 |
> can |
39 |
> proove (to myself to begin with) that what I have changed works, it'll |
40 |
> be |
41 |
> reintegrated with portage proper. |
42 |
|
43 |
understood... just calling it like i saw it |
44 |
|
45 |
thanks, |
46 |
|
47 |
-kapil |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |