Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:19:28
Message-Id: 200410211919.37224.luke-jr@utopios.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary by Nathaniel McCallum
1 On Thursday 21 October 2004 7:00 pm, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
2 > These problems (as rac mentions) can somewhat be overcome by freezing
3 > the toolchain or (as rac doesn't really mention) freezing the whole
4 > tree. I know freezing the tree has been mentioned as an "enterprise"
5 > type option (having a supported tree with backported security fixes),
6 > though it would help with desktop binary compatibility as well.
7
8 Or simply by updating the RDEPEND in the binary pkg to lock it to specific
9 versions of packages. The problem then would be figuring out which packages
10 are binary compatible and *not* locking those.
11 --
12 Luke-Jr
13 Developer, Utopios
14 http://utopios.org/

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>