Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Security and Comparison of Portage with other Package Managers

[Patrick Schleizer]

Zac Medico:
> On 03/06/2015 09:50 AM, Mark Kubacki wrote:
>> We're on the same side here.
>>
>> Do we have numbers showing the ratio "portage used with defaults" vs.
>> where "[webrsync-gpg] is described in many hardening guides for gentoo
>> and widely used among the security conscious" applies?
>>
>> DNS not being encrypted is just painting the whole picture. Point is,
>> the default is that "emerge --sync" results in a transfer using RSYNC
>> (or http).
>>
>> And by default you cannot compare the result with any authoritative source.
>>
>
> Ideally, we can rely on security mechanisms built into git [1], possibly
> involving signed commits.
>
> [1] https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo-portage-rsync-mirror

Then the question is, how secure are signatures when used wit hgit?

A while ago I wrote a blog post asking that question, referencing a lot
related information, started a discussion and also posted this on the
git mailing list.

"How safe are signed git tags? Only as safe as SHA-1 or somehow safer?"
[1] [2]

Cheers,
Patrick

[1]
https://www.whonix.org/blog/how-safe-are-signed-git-tags-only-as-safe-as-sha-1-or-somehow-safer
[2] http://www.mail-archive.com/git@×××××××××××.org/msg61087.html