| 1 |
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:45:30PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 09/21/2012 12:08 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hello |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > This comes from this gentoo-dev thread: |
| 6 |
> > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/260536 |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > In that one, we try to use the following: |
| 9 |
> > has vala ${IUSE//+/} && ! use vala && return 0 |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > as already done in many eclasses/ebuilds. The problem is that Ciaran |
| 12 |
> > wants to forbid it because he says it's not specified in PMS. My |
| 13 |
> > suggestion was to simply specify it as it's currently implemented in |
| 14 |
> > portage because that functionality is (apart of needed) being used for a |
| 15 |
> > long time in the tree by numerous eclasses/ebuilds, then, from my point |
| 16 |
> > of view, wouldn't be any sense on lose time for moving them to current |
| 17 |
> > functionality to a worse one, wait for the next eapi and, finally, |
| 18 |
> > revert them back to current behavior. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > The problem is that I cannot find any doc about how this is currently |
| 21 |
> > handled in portage. Could you help me on it please? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> That `has vala ${IUSE//+/}` thing should work for all versions of |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
*cough* negated defaults; you need a - in addition. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
~harring |
Archives