1 |
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 16:37 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 3:36 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > Just like 'many of the proposals lately', developers are going to be |
4 |
> > the ones disabling it (because they don't care), and users will be the |
5 |
> > ones enabling it (because they do care), just to learn that developers |
6 |
> > don't care and go complaining to the mailing lists that users dare |
7 |
> > report issues they don't care about. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I care if the patch is actually broken, which the warning doesn't |
10 |
> really tell me. It's just not a very reliable indicator, and will |
11 |
> produce false-positives frequently. |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
You can also take less context into the patch and use -F0. Then you'll |
15 |
have the same effect, no warnings to bother you and no pretending that |
16 |
the patch applies when it doesn't. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Best regards, |
20 |
Michał Górny |